|
Evidence that NASA is altering the true colors of the pictures of Mars [Mirror/adaptation of fire.prohosting.com/cleoger/marscolors/ ]
Investigation shows that there are several indications that the NASA is tampering with the colours, and changes them from an Earth-like environment into a red inhospitable environment. But it seems that the young scientists at Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) are not convenient with this.
Changed colour tabs Here is shown the first found evidence the NASA is altering the colours, in such a way, that blue is displayed as red:
Please follow the hyperlink and investigate the page. Note that the color calibration target shown on the other pictures where you can't see the sky, does have the colour blue on Mars and Earth, but on the large panoramic picture on the top of the page, they have changed blue into red! What happened? The blue has changed into red. This also explains why the green tab has turned into orange, because green is a combination of blue and yellow. If you change the blue component into red, yellow + red will give orange, exactly what happened in the picture. This means: All green elements in the complete picture have changed into orange, and all blue elements have changed into red!
JPL has it right At the press conference last saturday, the JPL-scientists showed the latest picture of the Martian landscape. It showed a salmon-coloured desert with a blue sky. It seems that they did it on purpose, since previous pictures were all extremely red. Below the pictures of the conference are shown: The above pictures were taken from Associated Press However, the people of the NASA have altered the colours into this: It shows the same picture with the same hill on the upper-right, slightly zoomed-out. The administration of the NASA seems to have tampered with the picture.
From sharp into blurry But there's more. On this NASA-site there's an article with: "Hazy Martian Skies". "This image mosaic taken by the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit's panoramic camera shows the hills southeast of Spirit's landing site. Like a smoggy day in Los Angeles, dusty martian skies limit how much detail can be seen" there's written in the article. Indeed, on NASA's version there's not much detail on the photo. An graphic expert, Keith Laney, used the raw RGB (red, green, blue) data provided by JPL to create the same picture. Click here to view this high-resolution panoramic view. It shows very much detail, and there seems to be no dust at all! Now compare this with here the NASA version. These are extremely different. If the colours were changed by "scientific point of view", they changed a sharp, contrast rich photo into a blurry, contrast poor picture. They seem to have dilebarately altered the colours to make Mars look unhospitable and dusty. The real version by Laney is so detailed, that you can see a fantastic pile of rocks. These same rocks look like a blurry red pile of rocks on the NASA-picture, with no detail at all. On the Laney-version it even seems that the arctifacts like "Sleepy Hollow" are waterice, or water. The guys from JPL say, in the press conference: "On the ground, the warmest temperature is around five degrees Celsius (37 Fahrenheit) and the coldest is -15 degrees Celsius (5 Fahrenheit)". But the NASA-site says: "This graph shows the predicted daily change in the atmospheric temperature one meter above the surface of Mars at Gusev Crater, the Mars Exploration Rover Spirit's landing site". With a picture above it with a curve shown from -70 degrees celcius to -5 degrees celcius! Who has right? De guys of JPL (The good guys), or the administrator of the NASA? If the young scientists from JPL are right, it might explain this: It seems to be nothing else but mud! This same picture, shows much more detail on Laneys coloured version: 
This colour calibration seems to be confirmed by scientists of Ames Research Center. They created a 3D-model of this anomaly: 
This picture above has been taken from http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-images/jan-12-2004/captions/image-5.html It's of high scientific relevance that the colours are displayed correct. As you can see, there are displayed blue rocks, which might indicate they might be iron ore rocks. This may raise the question: Why is the NASA doing this? There might be several reasons. Maybe this anomaly on Mars has something to do with it:
|
